What action by Eunice would be considered an unfair trade practice?

The action that would be considered an unfair trade practice involves claiming to be the listing agent for exclusive properties. In real estate, representing oneself as the listing agent for properties they do not have a valid agreement or permission to represent is misleading and deceptive to clients and potential buyers. This misrepresentation can lead to a breach of trust and a potential violation of ethical and legal standards set by real estate licensing bodies.

Unfair trade practices typically include actions that deceive, mislead, or otherwise harm consumers. By falsely claiming status as the listing agent, Eunice not only undermines the integrity of the real estate profession but also places both buyers and sellers at risk of entering into agreements based on inaccurate information.

The other actions listed, while potentially problematic in different contexts, do not inherently fall under the category of unfair trade practices as clearly as misrepresentation of agency status does. Promising clients a lower price may be a sales tactic or negotiation strategy but does not constitute a misrepresentation of authority. Providing false information to buyers is certainly unethical but claiming agency roles directly affects the trust and transparency required in real estate transactions. Offering additional services to clients can be a legitimate means of attracting business and enhancing client satisfaction, provided those services are accurately represented.